Showing posts with label josef albers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label josef albers. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2023

Mitchell Johnson Paintings on Back Cover of January 30, 2023 New Yorker Magazine

 

We have no way of knowing the true range of personality a single color may possess.



New Yorker Magazine January 30, 2023




Mitchell Johnson Painting in Truro May, 2005



If you click on the Truro painting above, you'll get a better quality image; the painting is called "Green Umbrella (North Truro)," 2023 24x38 inches, oil on canvas. These cottages in the painting still exist but they've changed and been renovated and I don't find them quite as interesting as they currently appear in the flesh. Fortunately, I have my memories and photos and can paint them as I wish. I drive by them several times each day when I visit North Truro in May and September. There was something innocent about the rough white exterior when I first started drawing them and painting them in 2005. The simple bands of sky, water and sand peeking out between the weathered siding behaved like an abstract painting. The triumvirate of sky, water, sand change color all day shifting appearance. Some days the sky disappears into the water. Other days the shade on the wood siding can merge completely with the dull gray water.  Around noon, when the tide is in, I've seen the deep water go to black next to the white siding. The endless combinations of color and light free me to combine any pieces of paint, any colors with any others.

The cottages are part of a group called Sutton Place that are characteristic of the area, Beach Point, that was frequently photographed by Joel Meyerowitz in the late 1970s. When I first stayed at Beach Point in May, 2005, I had no idea I was in Edward Hopper country.  In fact, I arrived on the Cape under the spell of some Europeans. Just weeks before driving into Truro I had visited an unusual exhibit of Josef Albers paintings installed next to Giorgio Morandi paintings at the Museo Morandi in Bologna, Italy. (There's a section in my book, Color as Content, where I recreate some of these Albers/Morandi pairings.) 

The cottages surely triggered something from my past like they do for everyone. Something about my Grandmother's house in Tampa, Florida or maybe something about beach houses I had stayed in as a child at Fort Story in Virginia or Fort Hancock in New Jersey. But most importantly they seemed connected to what happens when you see an Albers painting two feet away from a Morandi painting.  And they seemed connected to the objects that Morandi overlapped again and again in his discussions of personal relationships and perception. In 2005 my work was changing from impressionistic landscapes of France and Italy and responding to the Albers/Morandi encounter. For the first time, I was consciously filling the canvas with larger shapes: windows, buildings, distilled planes of sky, field or water. The views in North Truro dovetailed perfectly with my desire to find a new way to compose paintings and a search for a more complex feeling.

I often turn to photos from the Cape for compositional ideas when I am in the studio. In the Truro painting above, it may be hard to believe that the band of dull blue gray water is the exact same color on the right where it is a dark wedge separating the cottages and then on the left where it displays differently. Any given color has numerous faces, numerous roles, even in the same painting.  This is the point of the Truro paintings. Inside the window frame, the dark blue glows and luminously recedes as it battles the deep green square surrounding it. We have no way of knowing the true range of personality a single color may possess. 

Friday, February 18, 2011

Not Goethe Triangle

I was looking through my copy of Josef Albers’ complete, Interaction of Color in 2011 getting ready to speak to some kids about color theory. I don’t know how many people have noticed that the Goethe Triangle (one example from internet above) appears in some of the small paperback editions of Interaction of Color but not all of them. The triangle is one of the silkscreens in the reissued version of the complete original. Per Albers' request, the now famous silk screen was prepared by Rackstraw Downes and another Yale student for the original, handmade Interaction of Color, published by Yale in 1963. Albers first saw the triangle in a small german book on color theory written by Carry van Biema. There are notes at the Albers Foundation that document Albers' search for Biema’s book as he was preparing the final copy of Interaction of Color. Curiously, it turns out that Biema "made up" the Goethe triangle and if I remember correctly how the late Fred Horowitz explained this to me, Albers knew about the mistake before he died, but only well after his book had legitimized Biema’s creation and furthered awareness of the "triangle". I only bring this up because the triangle is all over the internet and in college art classrooms – even at Brown University, gaining momentum still
I didn't create this post to simply set the record straight. The best part of this little tale is that if the "Goethe triangle" helps people learn, then it doesn’t really matter who created the first version and I think Albers would agree that its legitimacy is irrelevant. The error somehow drives home Albers' own point about how complex and problematic it is to teach color theory; how personal the experience of color can be for anyone who takes its study seriously. Albers was a big advocate of practice and experience before theory. This was in opposition to Itten who was determined to develop a science for establishing a color course,  “facts” and theory as a prerequisite to the playful hands-on learning. (You can observe Itten's stance by noting the flow of the layout of "The Art of Colour.") The triangle, legitimate or not, begs to be reproduced by hand which invites a conversation about whether colors really mix and behave as described by theory or "fact". (you'll have to decide the answer for yourself.) Some people might be surprised to learn that for all of those fellow artists Albers embraced: Klee, Monet, Cezanne, Kandinsky, Goethe, Albers was not supportive of either Itten or Hans Hofmann.